Our Expertise

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

REPLAY: Age Discrimination Webinar

<!-- wp:html --> <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/2koRIqHgKx8" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen=""></iframe> <!-- /wp:html --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><br></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>On Tuesday Parklane Plowden employment specialists, <a href="https://lex.parklaneplowden.co.uk/temp/iHtmlEditorPreviews/202110271557817430.html?noCache=4972333">Andrew Sugarman</a> and <a href="https://lex.parklaneplowden.co.uk/temp/iHtmlEditorPreviews/202110271557817430.html?noCache=4972333">Gareth Price</a> delivered a webinar in our 'Law with Lunch' series titled 'Age Discrimination &amp; Compulsory Retirement'.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Following the EATs decision in Ewart/Pitcher v Oxford University, in which Andrew Sugarman acted successfully for Prof. Ewart, Andrew and Gareth Price explore the key issues facing employers when their employees approach retirement age. The talk considered the implications of the EATs decision to dismiss both appeals, that reached different decisions regarding the same retirement policy, when compulsory retirement policies are permitted and the burden on employers to justify direct age discrimination.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>To request the accompanying handout notes for this session please email <a href="mailto:tom.walters@parklaneplowden.co.uk">tom.walters@parklaneplowden.co.uk</a></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph -->