Our Expertise

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Parklane Plowden Chambers ranked as a Top Tier barristers’ set across five practice areas in the Legal 500 2026 rankings

<!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Parklane Plowden Chambers has been ranked as a Tier 1 set across five practice areas and a Tier 2 set across two practice areas in The Legal 500 2026 rankings.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Chambers has been listed as Tier 1, the highest ranking a set can achieve, across the chancery, probate and tax; clinical negligence; employment; family and children law and personal injury practice areas.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Parklane Plowden is also the only set to be ranked for both chancery, probate and tax and clinical negligence on the North Eastern circuit.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Additionally, the set has been ranked as Tier 2 for both inquests &amp; inquiries and court of protection.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Individual members received 82 rankings and 8 clerk rankings in this year’s edition across:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:list --> <ul class="wp-block-list"><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Court of Protection (Health and Welfare)</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Private Wealth, Probate and Tax</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Clinical Negligence</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Commercial Litigation</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Employment</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Family: Children and Domestic Violence</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Family: Divorce and Financial Remedy</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Personal Injury</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Property and Construction</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Professional Negligence</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Inquests and Inquiries</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --></ul> <!-- /wp:list --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph -->

Triathlon: Remediation Contribution Orders under the Building Safety Act 2022 – Part Two Review

<!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Listen to Parklane Plowden’s latest PLP Podcast – Triathlon: Remediation Contribution Orders under the Building Safety Act 2022 – Part Two Review</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Following the earlier <a href="https://www.parklaneplowden.co.uk/rcos-orders-under-the-building-safety-act-2022-part-one/">podcast</a> examining Remediation Contribution Orders (RCOs), PLP chancery, commercial and property barristers <a href="https://www.parklaneplowden.co.uk/our-barristers/bryan-patterson-whitaker/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bryan Patterson-Whitaker</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.parklaneplowden.co.uk/our-barristers/dominic-crossley/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dominic Crossley</a> look at the recent Court of Appeal case <em>Triathlon Homes LLP v Stratford Village Development Partnership</em> [2025] EWCA Civ 846.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>After finding significant building safety defects in five residential towers in East London, Triathlon Homes applied to the First-tier Tribunal for a RCO against the site’s developers.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The RCO was granted and a leapfrog appeal was launched by the developers to the Court of Appeal. Bryan and Dominic look at the two key grounds behinds the appeal.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The first ground was whether it was just and equitable to grant an RCO. Sub-grounds to this included whether the First-tier Tribunal had wrongly created a presumption that it was just and equitable to grant an RCO, Triathlon’s motivations behind applying for an RCO as well as the availability of public funding for remedial works. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>In its ruling upholding the RCO, several significant points were made about validity of the First-tier Tribunal’s decision in its interpretation of the Building Safety Act.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>These include primary responsibility for costs, the changing identity of beneficial owners and the relevance of pursuing claims against other parties such as contractors.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>The two also examine the grounds as to whether RCOs can be made retrospectively so that they have application before the provisions laid out in the Building Safety Act came into force.&nbsp;</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Finally, Bryan and Dominic consider what the likely implications are from this ruling for different parties including developer and funders, managing agents and leasehold owners as well as legal practitioners.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Listen to the podcast below:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Helpful resources and further reading:</strong></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:list {"ordered":true} --> <ol class="wp-block-list"><!-- wp:list-item --> <li><a href="https://d34xi2cisccwsg.cloudfront.net/reported-cases/Triathlon-v-SVDP.pdf">Court of Appeal ruling</a></li> <!-- /wp:list-item --></ol> <!-- /wp:list --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph -->

25th June 2025 | Judgment Over Breakfast: Unpacking Nazir v Begum [2025] EWCA Civ 587

<!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Join our Chancery Team for our latest breakfast seminar, where our specialists&nbsp;<a href="https://www.parklaneplowden.co.uk/our-barristers/stuart-roberts/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Stuart Roberts</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.parklaneplowden.co.uk/our-barristers/cait-sweeney/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Cait Sweeney</a>&nbsp;will be discussing the implications of the recent Court of Appeal decision in Nazir v Begum [2025] EWCA Civ 587.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph {"align":"center"} --> <p class="has-text-align-center"><strong>‘When a trust is not a trust?’</strong></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph {"align":"center"} --> <p class="has-text-align-center"><strong>Adverse possession of land held by PRs – a review of Nazir v Begum in the Court of Appeal.</strong></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Join us from 8:00 am for a light breakfast, coffee, and the chance to speak informally with our speakers before the session begins at 8:30 am.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p><strong>Location:</strong> Parklane Plowden Chambers, 19 Westgate, Leeds, LS1 2RD</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>If you haven't received this invite directly and would like to sign up, please register&nbsp;<a href="https://lexlinks.parklaneplowden.co.uk/doForm.aspx?a=0xF15D4A97E0E04123&amp;d=0x49EB4C9596DBE1A5^0xBDC0B87423493533|0x40F3E49C83A12815^0xAF1BA1DD83354AE1|0xF1B146662D144B75^0x8A1CDD2DB76555E3|0x9CB58EF48012E032^0x440EABE993E0B752|0xA14B30AADF25AF0D^0x4538EA01547C6D9520542FC6B6F63C93|0x43D48F22BB6859DF^0x440EABE993E0B752|0xD52134AC788FF0FE^0xAF1BA1DD83354AE1|" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a>.&nbsp;</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph -->

Parklane Plowden Chambers Announces Two New Deputy Heads

<!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Parklane Plowden Chambers is delighted to announce the election of two deputy heads of chambers, <a href="https://www.parklaneplowden.co.uk/our-barristers/sarah-harrison/">Sarah Harrison</a> and <a href="https://www.parklaneplowden.co.uk/our-barristers/sara-anning/">Sara Anning</a>.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Sarah was first elected as deputy head of chambers in 2023. Following her re-election, she will continue in her role as a director of Plowden Facilities. Sarah was also the head of the chancery and commercial team at Parklane Plowden until 2023.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Sara Anning was appointed as a Recorder (Family) on the North Eastern Circuit and has sat as a Fee Paid Judge of the Mental Health Tribunal since 2018. As deputy head of chambers, Sara will lead on career progression for members of chambers and pastoral issues.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Commenting on their elections, head of chambers, <a href="https://www.parklaneplowden.co.uk/our-barristers/elizabeth-hodgson/">Elizabeth Hodgson</a>, said:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>“I am delighted to be supported as head of chambers by Sara and Sarah, who are not only leading barristers in their respective practice areas but have exceptional skills that make them well-suited for the specific roles that each will fulfil as deputy heads of chambers.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>“Their appointments are significant for Chambers, not least because for the first time the head and deputy heads of chambers are an all women team.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>“I look forward to working closely with them, our head of teams, and our senior management team as we continue to develop our ambitious and progressive Chambers for the benefit of our clients, our staff and our members.”</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph -->

Parklane Plowden Chambers ranked as a Top Tier barristers’ set across five practice areas in the Legal 500 2025 rankings

<!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Parklane Plowden Chambers has been ranked as a Tier 1 set across five practice areas and a Tier 2 set across two practice areas in The Legal 500 2025 rankings.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Chambers has been listed as Tier 1, the highest ranking a set can achieve, across the chancery, probate and tax; clinical negligence; employment; family and children law and personal injury practice areas.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Parklane Plowden is also the only set to be ranked for both chancery, probate and tax and clinical negligence on the North Eastern circuit.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Additionally, the set has been ranked as Tier 2 for both inquests &amp; inquiries and court of protection &amp; community care.</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p>Individual members received 83 rankings in this year’s edition across:</p> <!-- /wp:paragraph --><!-- wp:list --> <ul class="wp-block-list"><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Court of Protection and Community Care</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Chancery, Probate and Tax</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Clinical Negligence</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Commercial Litigation</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Employment</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Family: Children and Domestic Violence</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Family: Divorce and Financial Remedy</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Personal Injury</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Property and Construction</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Professional Negligence</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --><!-- wp:list-item --> <li>Inquests and Inquiries</li> <!-- /wp:list-item --></ul> <!-- /wp:list --><!-- wp:paragraph --> <p></p> <!-- /wp:paragraph -->